Skip to main content

Conveyor monitoring

The drives are on the floor. The faults are in the gearbox.

Baggage systems, parcel sorters, mining belts, packaging lines. The motor is accessible. The gearbox is not. SAM4 uses Electrical Signature Analysis (ESA) to read current at the motor control cabinet (MCC) and surfaces both. Motor health and gearbox load, without sensors on the line.

Drive endWhere ESA reads from the MCC
30Scored cases past 12 months
Belt spanWhere complementary monitoring leads
Why monitor conveyors

When the conveyor stops, the entire process stops

Conveyors are the arteries of bulk material handling. They connect crushers to screens, mills to stockpiles, and production lines to dispatch. A single conveyor failure halts an entire processing chain. Yet most conveyors run with no condition monitoring beyond an ammeter reading and a walk-past inspection.

Line stops

One conveyor down, line down

A single conveyor failure halts the entire processing chain. Crushers stop. Mills idle. Stockpiles cannot be replenished. Most conveyors run with no condition monitoring beyond an ammeter reading and a walk-past inspection.

35%

Of conveyor drive failures are bearing-related: the kind of degradation that develops over weeks, not hours.

4–8 hrs

Average downtime for an unplanned conveyor belt or drive failure in a mining operation.

How ESA reads conveyor health

One sensor location. The entire drivetrain visible.

SAM4 measures current and voltage at the motor control cabinet, the same panel your electricians already access. From those signals, it extracts torque modulations, speed variations, and spectral patterns that reveal the condition of the motor, gearbox, coupling, and drive roller without a single sensor on the conveyor structure.

Load signature analysis

A conveyor's motor current reflects the total mechanical load on the belt. Blockages, material buildup, belt tension changes, and overload conditions all shift the torque demand pattern. SAM4 tracks these shifts against a healthy baseline and flags deviations before they cause damage or spillage.

Drivetrain fault frequencies

Bearing defects in the drive roller, idler bearings, and gearbox create characteristic fault frequencies (BPFO, BPFI) that modulate the motor current. Misalignment between motor, gearbox, and drive roller produces a 2× running speed component. SAM4 tracks these spectral signatures continuously.

Motor electrical health

Stator winding degradation, broken rotor bars, and supply quality issues are detected directly from the electrical signature. These faults account for a significant share of conveyor drive failures and are invisible to vibration monitoring or visual inspection.

Representative SAM4 dashboard view. The cabinet read produces fault classifications with evidence levels and recommended actions. On conveyors, the same workflow runs against drive-end load and bearing signatures coming back through the gearbox.

SAM4 dashboard view of a fault detection, with load-pattern anomaly, classification, and recommended action
1

Signal flagged

SAM4 detects an anomaly in the current or voltage signature. Automated rules trigger initial review.
2

Expert review

A Samotics analyst checks the signal against process context, asset history, and known failure patterns. Filters out false positives before they reach you.
3

Fault classified

Confirmed faults are tagged with type, severity, and an evidence level that reflects the strength of the supporting field evidence.
4

Action recommended

You receive a specific recommendation: inspect, monitor, schedule, or act now. Outcome from the action feeds back into the validation set.
Fit and detection boundaries

What SAM4 detects on this asset, and where it doesn't fit

One table. Each fault class appears once with its signal path, the strength of field evidence on this asset class, and the recommended use of SAM4. Conveyors are distributed systems: ESA reads the powered drive end well; faults along the belt span are outside ESA's reach and need complementary monitoring. Field evidence drawn from 30 reviewed conveyor cases over the 12 months ending 2026-05-01.

Fault classSignal pathField evidence on this assetUse SAM4 as
Phase loss and voltage imbalanceDirect / electrical. Resolved at the cabinet from current and voltage symmetry.Cases reviewed. No misses observed in the sample.Primary monitoring
Process-induced load deviationLoad signature. Overload, blockage, spillage, and material redistribution reach the current as torque change.Detected consistently across the cohort.Primary monitoring
Mechanical unbalanceLoad signature + 1x running speed. Reaches motor current through the rotor.Small sample reviewed. Detected consistently.Primary monitoring
Gearbox degradation or gear-mesh anomalyOutput-shaft signatures coupled to the motor.Most conveyors are gearbox-driven. Cases reviewed. Pathway established.Conditional
Coupling-related load anomalyLoad signature + 1x.Small sample reviewed. No misses observed.Conditional
Shaft or coupling misalignmentLoad signature + 2x.Small sample reviewed. Vibration phase analysis discriminates root cause.Conditional
Pulley or drive roller bearing degradationIndirect electromagnetic + load.Small sample reviewed. Drive-end bearings visible at the cabinet.Conditional
Belt slip on drive pulleyLoad step-change. Detected through current dropout against load.Cases reviewed. Pattern detected consistently.Conditional
Stator winding short indicatorsDirect / electrical.Pathway established across asset classes. Conveyor-specific cohort still building.Conditional
Rotor bar degradationIndirect electromagnetic.Pathway established across asset classes. Conveyor-specific cohort still building.Conditional
Soft foot indicatorsDistinctive base-mounting signature in the current.Small sample reviewed.Conditional
Bearing degradationIndirect electromagnetic + load. Drive-end bearings visible; far-end bearings attenuate with distance.Stable runtime helps; intermittent duty thins the signal. Vibration on the drive head remains the better tool for raceway-level diagnosis.Late-stage detection
Idler roller bearings (along the belt span)Outside envelope. Distributed and not coupled to the drive motor torque.Use acoustic emission, walking inspections, or roller-mounted sensors on critical idlers.Use other methods
Belt tear, rip, or longitudinal damageOutside envelope. No torque modulation before catastrophic failure.Use belt-mounted vision, RFID, or conveyor monitoring systems.Use other methods
Belt tracking issues along the spanOutside envelope. Centerline drift not coupled to motor current.Use laser tracking or vision-based belt monitors.Use other methods
Monitoring architecture

What ESA covers. What vibration covers. Where they overlap.

Conveyors are distributed systems. The motor, gearbox, and drive roller are accessible at one end. Hundreds of idler rollers, pulleys, and belt spans stretch across the rest. ESA monitors the powered end from the MCC. Vibration and belt monitoring technologies cover the distributed structure. Each fills gaps the other cannot reach.

ESA leads

  • Motor electrical faults (stator winding, rotor bars, power quality)
  • Overload and blockage detection via load signature shift
  • Drive roller and gearbox bearing trends
  • Coupling condition through torque modulation
  • Energy waste from mechanical inefficiency or oversizing
ESA's strongest conveyor application is drive-end monitoring: the motor, gearbox, coupling, and drive roller. Where torque modulations transmit efficiently to the current signature.

Both contribute

  • Drive roller bearing degradation: ESA detects torque modulation, vibration confirms severity staging
  • Gearbox health: ESA sees load changes, vibration provides localised fault diagnosis
  • Misalignment: ESA detects 2× component, vibration discriminates misalignment from imbalance via phase
When both technologies flag the same fault, diagnostic confidence increases. ESA provides the early trend; vibration provides the root-cause discrimination.

Vibration / belt monitoring leads

  • Idler bearing failures (mechanically remote from motor, invisible to ESA)
  • Belt condition: splice integrity, surface damage, cord breakage
  • Belt tracking and alignment along the full conveyor length
  • Pulley lagging wear and structural looseness
  • Chute wear, impact damage, and return side blockage
Vibration sensors and belt scanners cover the distributed structure: idlers, pulleys, and belt spans. That ESA cannot reach from the motor control cabinet.

ESA monitors the drive. Belt monitoring covers the structure. Together they close the gap.

Most conveyor monitoring programmes focus on belt condition: scanners, cord-break detectors, alignment sensors. These protect the belt, which is the highest-cost component. But they tell you nothing about the drive motor, gearbox, or coupling that power the system.

ESA fills that gap. One sensor set at the MCC monitors the entire powered drivetrain continuously. For a facility with 20–50 conveyors, ESA provides fleet-wide drive health at a fraction of the cost of accelerometers on each drive roller and gearbox.

Detecting an anomaly in the drive end still beats discovering a catastrophic gearbox failure during a belt change. Classification can follow from inspection.

Conveyor detections

Real faults caught on conveyors

See all detection stories
Installation on conveyors

Under 60 minutes. No access to the conveyor structure required.

1. Open the motor control cabinet

SAM4 installs at the MCC, the same panel your electricians already access. No confined space entry, no scaffolding.

2. Clip sensors onto motor supply cables

Current and voltage sensors clip directly onto existing motor cabling. Installation requires a brief motor de-energisation while sensors are fitted, typically scheduled with operations. No wiring changes.

3. Connect and commission

The SAM4 gateway connects via cellular (4G/LTE). No dependency on your IT network. Monitoring starts immediately, with first diagnostic results within 48 hours.

SAM4 sensors installed on motor supply cables inside a motor control cabinet
Methodology

How this page is validated

Reviewed evidence from the 12 months ending 2026-05-01. The conveyor sample is below the 50-case threshold for a single headline figure, so this page reports per-fault detected and missed counts case by case. The cards below describe how the evidence base grows and what evidence is available today.

How the conveyor evidence base grows

  • Each alert SAM4 raises on a conveyor is followed up against customer-confirmed outcomes
  • Cases are scored independently: detected, missed, or false alert
  • Sub-types are tracked separately: belt, roller, chain
  • 30 scored cases on conveyors over the 12 months ending 2026-05-01, with 2 false alerts logged
  • Field evidence on this asset moves from a clear signal path to case-by-case proof to a published metric as the evidence base grows

What the validation report contains

  • Case-level detail with signal trace, asset context, and resolution
  • Exclusion criteria and review rules
  • Pathway-level breakdown by fault mode and conveyor sub-type
  • Available to qualified technical evaluators

See SAM4 monitoring conveyors

A 30-minute demo shows SAM4 running on conveyors like yours, with real fault data and real diagnostics.