{"id":4812,"date":"2023-06-14T10:00:02","date_gmt":"2023-06-14T10:00:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/samotics.com\/?p=4812"},"modified":"2026-01-07T13:21:57","modified_gmt":"2026-01-07T12:21:57","slug":"reducing-wastewater-inlet-station-energy-costs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/samotics.com\/it\/case-studies\/reducing-wastewater-inlet-station-energy-costs","title":{"rendered":"I costi energetici della stazione di ingresso delle acque reflue sono stati ridotti di 42.000 euro all'anno."},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pageheader__content\">\n<p class=\"pageheader__intro text--l\">Due pompe a vite funzionavano a meno di un terzo della loro potenza nominale. L'SAM4 Energy ha stabilito che una sola pompa a vite potrebbe facilmente gestire tutto il flusso durante il tempo secco, con un risparmio di 42.000 euro all'anno e una riduzione dell'impronta di carbonio di 75 tonnellate all'anno.<\/p>\n<section id=\"io-key-0\" class=\"block block--text block--wysiwyg bg--primary container--m gutter--m block--inview\">\n<div class=\"block__inner\">\n<div class=\"block__content\">\n<div class=\"block__text text--styled\">\n<h2><strong>Problema<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Due pompe a vite Archimede funzionavano in parallelo nella stazione di ingresso di un impianto di trattamento delle acque reflue. Entrambe le pompe avevano una potenza nominale di 185 kW. Sulla base dei dati operativi, SAM4 Energy ha determinato che le pompe trascorrevano quasi la met\u00e0 del tempo in funzione a meno di un terzo della potenza nominale, riducendo l'efficienza energetica della stazione di 25%.<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-4814\" src=\"https:\/\/samotics.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Problem-histogram.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1200\" height=\"817\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/samotics.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Problem-histogram.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/samotics.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Problem-histogram-300x204.jpg 300w, https:\/\/samotics.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Problem-histogram-1024x697.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/samotics.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Problem-histogram-768x523.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"io-key-0\" class=\"block block--media bg--primary container--m gutter--m\">\n<div class=\"block__inner\">\n<div class=\"block__media\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"io-key-0\" class=\"block block--text block--wysiwyg bg--primary bg--primary container--m gutter--m\">\n<div class=\"block__inner\">\n<div class=\"block__content\">\n<div class=\"block__text text--styled\">\n<h2><strong>Soluzione<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Poich\u00e9 la regione servita dall'impianto di trattamento utilizza fognature combinate, in cui le piogge passano attraverso le stesse tubature dei rifiuti domestici, la stazione di ingresso \u00e8 stata progettata per gestire i picchi di flusso dovuti alle condizioni atmosferiche. Il nostro team Energy ha utilizzato i dati storici per determinare che una singola pompa a coclea poteva facilmente gestire tutto il flusso durante il tempo secco, che in questa regione \u00e8 nove mesi all'anno. Questa singola pompa funzionerebbe quindi con un carico maggiore, migliorando la sua efficienza.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-4816\" src=\"https:\/\/samotics.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Solution-graph.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1200\" height=\"566\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/samotics.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Solution-graph.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/samotics.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Solution-graph-300x142.jpg 300w, https:\/\/samotics.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Solution-graph-1024x483.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/samotics.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Solution-graph-768x362.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"io-key-0\" class=\"block block--media bg--primary container--m gutter--m\">\n<div class=\"block__inner\">\n<div class=\"block__content\">\n<figure class=\"block__figure figure--cw figure--image\">\n<div class=\"block__media\"><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"io-key-0\" class=\"block block--text block--wysiwyg bg--primary bg--primary container--m gutter--m\">\n<div class=\"block__inner\">\n<div class=\"block__content\">\n<div class=\"block__text text--styled\">\n<h2><strong>Risparmio<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Questa semplice modifica operativa farebbe risparmiare al proprietario della pompa 42.000 euro all'anno di costi energetici e ridurrebbe le emissioni di carbonio della stazione di 75 tonnellate all'anno.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"io-key-0\" class=\"block block--media bg--primary container--m gutter--m\">\n<div class=\"block__inner\">\n<div class=\"block__content\">\n<div class=\"block__media\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-4815\" src=\"https:\/\/samotics.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/energy_optimization_case_inlet_station_table.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1200\" height=\"521\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/samotics.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/energy_optimization_case_inlet_station_table.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/samotics.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/energy_optimization_case_inlet_station_table-300x130.jpg 300w, https:\/\/samotics.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/energy_optimization_case_inlet_station_table-1024x445.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/samotics.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/energy_optimization_case_inlet_station_table-768x333.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px\" \/><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Two screw pumps operated at less than a third of their nominal power. SAM4 Energy determined that a single screw pump could easily handle all the flow during dry weather, saving \u20ac42k\/year and reducing carbon footprint by 75 tons\/year. Problem Two Archimedes screw pumps operated in parallel at the inlet station to a wastewater treatment [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4813,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"content-type":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"no","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"coauthors":[22],"class_list":["post-4812","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-case-studies"],"modified_by":"Gino Gagliardi","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/samotics.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4812","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/samotics.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/samotics.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/samotics.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/samotics.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4812"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/samotics.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4812\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4818,"href":"https:\/\/samotics.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4812\/revisions\/4818"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/samotics.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4813"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/samotics.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4812"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/samotics.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4812"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/samotics.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4812"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/samotics.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=4812"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}